Legal Opinion

Stumpf v. Stumpf

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1935No. 26128PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by the plaintiff, Mary M. Stumpf, praying-for a decree of separate maintenance. On the 3rd day of August, 1934, after certain proceedings, the court rendered a decree for absolute divorce.

Subsequent to the rendition of divorce the parties reunited, and so far as the record shows are at this time living together.

A motion for a new trial and a motion to vacate the part of the judgment granting fees in the sum of $4,500 was heard by the judge on the 21st day of September, 1934, and lie reduced the attorneys fees from $4,500 to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Davidson v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Farrell v. Betts & BettsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Albert v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Harwood v. CarterNevada Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Gallaspy v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Railway Express Agency v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Kelly v. MaupinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API