Legal Opinion

Albert v. Albert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1926No. 16443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, 0.

The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they were designated in the trial court.

The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, prosecuted this appeal from a finding and decree, of the district court of Osage county entered on the 12th day of February, 1925, the material -parts of which are as follows:

“That the plaintiff and defendant were married as in plaintiff’s petition alleged. That both the plaintiff and defendant have been actual residents in good faith of Osage county, Okla., for more than one year next preceding the' filing ctf this petition. That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yost v. YostIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Derritt v. DerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Sango v. SangoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harden v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Moseley v. MoseleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Stumpf v. StumpfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Whitehorn v. WhitehornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Stott v. StottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API