Legal Opinion

Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1962No. 39588PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In the trial court, plaintiffs Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse sued the defendant, Garland Coal and Mining Company, for damages for breach of contract. Judgment was for plaintiffs in an amount considerably less than was sued for. Plaintiffs appeal and defendant cross-appeals.

In the briefs on appeal, the parties present their argument and contentions under several propositions; however, they all *111stem from the basic question of whether the trial court properly instructed the jury on the measure of damages.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows: plaintiffs owned a farm…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Mann v. ClowserSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. Ardizonne v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Chamberlain v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Groves v. John Wunder Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Armco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. DunbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API