Legal Opinion

Harwood v. Carter

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1924No. 2597PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*337By the Court,

Sanders, J.:

These cases were consolidated and tried as one case in the court below, and upon the calling of the cases for trial it was agreed in open court that the decision or judgment in either case should be conclusive and binding on the parties in the other. The two appeals involve *338the same subject-matter. They are briefed and submitted together so as to be considered in one opinion.

For present purposes the facts and the proceedings may be stated to be as follows:

On January 10, 1908, Mary E. Carter, then the wife of Sardis Summerfield, employed plaintiffs as her attorneys to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake v. LakeNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Mudd v. MuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Lake v. LakeNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Tucker v. Mayor of VirginiaNevada Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Culley v. BadgleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Folks v. FolksNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Stumpf v. StumpfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Hough v. Reserve Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Siebert v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Folks v. FolksNevada Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API