Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1928No. 18259PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

The essential facts in this case are as follows:

1. Lena Friedman filed suit for divorce against her husband, Loues Friedman, in the district court of Tulsa county, and after the issues were properly joined, on the 10th day of March, 1925, the court rendered a judgment in the case granting plaintiff a divorce and the apportionment of personal effects, allowance of alimony, and judgment for the cost. The court reserved his decision upon the question of attorney fees claimed by plaintiff. The exact language of the court as it is incorporated in the judgment is as follows:

"It is further…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Beadleston v. . BeadlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Lake v. . LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Lemons v. LemonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Schenberg v. SchenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Gilcrease v. GilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Aronson v. AronsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API