Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Nazarenus

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1962No. 35627PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was instituted by the city of Seattle to compel appellants Nazarenus and wife to remove certain portions of their dwelling from the right of way described in an agreement for a perpetual easement for the construction, operation, and maintenance of an electric transmission system which extends from the city to its hydroelectric plants located on the Skagit River in What-com County. The agreement was executed and delivered to the city in 1923 by one James Fraunfelter (the alleged predecessor in interest of appellants), and filed for record in the office of the county auditor of King…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bigelow v. MoodWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. MinnetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. City of Seattle v. FaussettWashington Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brown v. VossWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Standing Rock Homeowners Ass'n v. MisichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API