Legal Opinion

Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2003No. 72635-3PublishedCited by 278 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District (SVID) maintains irrigation ditches, commonly referred to as laterals, in the Yakima County region. In general, adjacent landowners have granted express floating or roving easements to SVID to enter land adjacent to the laterals and remove any sediment and growth collected over time that obstructs the flow of water. This case involves easements for the Matheson 2.68 lateral (lateral). The issue is whether the parties intended widening of the easement to accommodate increased irrigation demands and the use of more efficient maintenance equipment. SVID…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. City of Seattle v. NazarenusWashington Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by278 opinions

  1. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005

273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API