Legal Opinion
Brown v. Voss
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1986No. 51283-3PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
The question posed is to what extent, if any, the holder of a private road easement can traverse the servient estate to reach not only the original dominant estate, but a subsequently acquired parcel when those two combined parcels are used in such a way that there is no increase in the burden on the servient estate. The trial court denied the injunction sought by the owners of the servient estate. The Court of Appeals reversed. Brown v. Voss, 38 Wn. App. 777, 689 P.2d 1111 (1984). We
[[Image here]]
*369reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.
A portion of an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Seattle v. NazarenusWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Zobrist v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Resident Action Council v. Seattle Housing AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- GRANITE BEACH HOLDINGS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.