Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Mood

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1960No. 35132PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

— This is an action for specific performance of a written contract for the purchase of real property located in King county. From a judgment on the merits for the plaintiff-purchaser, the defendant-seller appeals. The sole question presented is as to the legal sufficiency of the property description contained in the contract. The contract described the property as follows:

“That portion of Government Lot 2, section 31, Township 23 north, range 4 east, W.M., described as follows:
“Beginning at the southeast corner of lot # 1, Block # 2, Glengael, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 52…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Barth v. BarthWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Fosburgh v. SandoWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Bingham v. SherfeyWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API