Bigelow v. Mood
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
— This is an action for specific performance of a written contract for the purchase of real property located in King county. From a judgment on the merits for the plaintiff-purchaser, the defendant-seller appeals. The sole question presented is as to the legal sufficiency of the property description contained in the contract. The contract described the property as follows:
“That portion of Government Lot 2, section 31, Township 23 north, range 4 east, W.M., described as follows:
“Beginning at the southeast corner of lot # 1, Block # 2, Glengael, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 52…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Barth v. BarthWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Fosburgh v. SandoWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Bingham v. SherfeyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by35 opinions
- Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.