Legal Opinion

Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1959No. 34820PublishedCited by 570 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals from a judgment against it for a sum found to be due under the terms of a written contract.

On a contract for the packing and sale of their apple crop, respondents, plaintiffs below, sued for the difference between the contract price and the amount paid by appellant to the respondents, which difference the court found to be $10,271.73.

Respondents are orchardists near Oroville, Washington, and grow Golden Delicious apples. Appellant’s business is to market such fruit. By written contract, the appellant agreed to pack and sell the respondents’ apples. It also…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kolkman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wise v. FardenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. North Bend Stage Line, Inc. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Fischler v. NicklinWashington Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by570 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974

565 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API