Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11444PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing in this court was granted after decision by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district (53 Cal. App. Dec. 813), for the reason that, while satisfied with the reasoning of said opinion, we arrived at the conclusion that the order of reversal and direction to the trial court with which the same concludes should be modified. We therefore adopt the opinion of Mr. Justice Hart o£ said court, with the exception of its concluding order and direction, which reads as follows:

“This is action by the plaintiffs to obtain a decree quieting their alleged title…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  3. Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Faivre v. DaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Carr v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Marshall v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Saunders v. SaundersIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Wilkerson v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API