Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Standard Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1936No. Civ. 5633PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon an appeal from the judgment of the trial court perpetually enjoining and restraining the City of Huntington Beach and its lessee, Carr Oil Corporation, from carrying on drilling and oil production operations on and within a portion of that public street or highway known as “Ocean Avenue”. The action was begun by A. D. Marshall, a citizen and taxpayer of the City of Huntington Beach, to restrain such operations. Respondents Huntington Beach Company and Pacific Electric Railway Company each filed cross-complaints against the city and its lessee, Carr Oil Corporation.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Smith v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Brown v. SpilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Warren v. MayorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Elliott v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Briggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API