Legal Opinion

Faivre v. Daley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1892No. 14400PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

George D. Carleton, a married man, became the owner of the property referred to in the complaint on January 11, 1868, and on July 7, 1868, he filed a homestead thereon. On April 8, 1870, Carleton executed and delivered to A. E. Horton a deed of con*666veyance of the property, and thereafter Horton’s interest, if he acquired any, passed through mesne conveyances to S. S. Clark. The trustees of Clark’s estate executed and delivered a deed of the land — grant, bargain, and sale in form — to plaintiff, on June 22, 1885, the considation named being $7,087. On July 8, 1885, Carleton and wife executed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Morrison v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Hardenbergh v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Eldridge v. See Yup Co.California Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Castro v. TennentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Johnston v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jacobs v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Moore v. HoarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API