Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1986No. 85-129PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

This case is an appeal from a declaratory judgment imposing a constructive trust on interests in severed mineral estates derived from a ranching business relationship of ancestors to the present litigants. Two separate ranches were involved.

The trial court’s decision in granting the relief requested by imposition of a constructive trust will be affirmed.

The three groups of participants as claimants to the severed mineral interests are the Simpson family (Simpson), successors to Erie Simpson, as defendants and now appellants with the Kistler Investment Company, as successor…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Bridger v. . PiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Weber v. Johnston Fuel Liners, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Naab v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fanning v. FanningWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Tader v. TaderWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Weisbrod v. ElyWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bolan v. Avalon Farms Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API