Legal Opinion

Parks v. Gates

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1921No. Sac. No. 2919PublishedCited by 28 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

This appeal is from a judgment enjoining defendant from obstructing and interfering with plaintiff’s maintenance and use of an irrigating ditch across a twenty-four-foot strip of land, the fee title to which is claimed by both parties.

The history of the transaction as appears from the record shows that some years prior to this litigation one Hurlburt and the respondent Parks owned as tenants in common a tract of land comprising 176 acres. Later, by an interchange of deeds, Hurlburt became the owner of the north seventy-six acres of the tract and Parks became the owner of the south one hundred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Quinlan v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Montgomery v. SturdivantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Long Beach v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API