Legal Opinion
Scott Paper Company v. Fort Howard Paper Company
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 25, 1972No. 60-C-156PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER.
TEHAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Scott Paper Company, has moved for summary judgment dismissing the third counterclaim filed by the defendant, Fort Howard Paper Company, which counterclaim, after alleging diversity jurisdiction provides:
“23. In or about 1957 plaintiff distributed to its sales representatives a substantial number of ‘Scott Towl-Tables’ and Scott Towl’ Table identification keys, which towl-tables contained erroneous comparative information as to Fort Howard-identified Brands F and G.
24. The preparation and distribution of the Towl-Tables as set forth in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erick Bowman Remedy Co. v. Jensen Salsbery Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Buehrer v. Provident Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
- Brown v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
- Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule IndustriesSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Colucci v. Chicago Crime CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Henry V. Vaccaro Construction Co. v. A. J. DePace, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Flotech, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Gee v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.