Legal Opinion

Flotech, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 31, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-3395-YPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

On November 1, 1983, FTI Flotech, Inc. (“Flotech”) and Fluoramics, Inc. (“Fluoram-ics”) 1 instituted this action against E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Company (“Du Pont”). The plaintiffs, Fluoramics and Flotech, are, respectively, the manufacturer and the former principal distributor and marketing agent of a motor oil additive product called “Tufoil” (pronounced “tough-oil”). By their complaint, exhibits and documents, Flotech and Fluoramics assert that Du Pont disparaged or defamed their product, Tufoil, by a Du Pont press release issued February 1,…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Foley v. Lowell Sun Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. HipSaver, Inc. v. KielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  4. In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
  5. John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API