Legal Opinion
Gee v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 29, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3443PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
Appellants, the sole owners of all stock in the four El Grande Markets in Tucson, brought suit to recover damages for loss of business caused by the publication by appel-lee of facts showing that the markets sold perishable goods after they should have been removed from the market shelves. The trial court granted summary judgment for appellee. We affirm.
The threshold question on appeal is the nature of the claim for relief stated by the complaint. Since the alleged damages stem from the publication of information to the public, the action is one either for libel or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
- Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Tempe v. Pilot Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Schuldes v. National Surety CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Lehigh Chemical Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Unelko Corp., an Illinois Corporation Howard G. Ohlhausen v. Andy Rooney, an Individual Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Andreanoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
- Idaho Norland Corp. v. Caelter Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1981
- Morley v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Atlatl Group LLC v. JarvisDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.