Legal Opinion

Segall v. Hurwitz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 27, 1983No. 81-1816PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Plaintiff Segall appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his complaint against Peter Miller, Archie Horne, Jr., David Hoff, Roger Gaumnitz, Max Hurwitz and The Park Bank. We conclude that the trial court erred in applying the statute of limitations to bar claims against Miller and Horne. We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings as to those claims and otherwise affirm.

This action was commenced May 23, 1979 when Seg-all’s complaint was filed. It expressly sets forth six separately stated claims for relief. It alleges two claims for breach of a contract by which Segall…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Gray v. LackeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Dunn v. RockwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hi-Lite Products Company v. American Home Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API