Buehrer v. Provident Mutual Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Counsel for plaintiff in error asks ús to reverse the judgment of the lower courts for various reasons. He maintains: (1) That his cause of action arose from a breach of contract and is controlled by the statutory limitation applying to contract breaches. (2) If that statute does not apply, he maintains that his action states a cause for “trespassing upon real property” or for “injuring it,” within the meaning of Section 11224, General Code, whereby an action may be brought within four years after the cause accrued. He further maintains that, should the court decide that the one-year statute…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kemper v. FortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Erie County Farmers' Ins. v. CreceliusOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Roundtree v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- O'Neill v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Denney v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Bonner v. Chicago Title InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Green v. LemarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule IndustriesSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.