Legal Opinion

Schloss v. Schloss

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1968No. 281PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaice, J.

Our sole concern upon this appeal is with an order awarding subsistence and counsel fees to the plaintiff pendente lite in her action for alimony without divorce. The rights of the parties are governed by G.S. 50-16, since this litigation began prior to the repeal of that statute by the Session Laws of 1967, chapter 1152. The 1967 Act provides expressly that it shall not apply to pending litigation.

The pertinent provisions of G.S. 50-16 are:

“If any husband shall separate himself from his wife and fail to provide her * * * with the necessary subsistence according to his means and condition in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Holloway v. . HollowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Sprinkle v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API