Legal Opinion

In Re Custody of Stancil

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1971No. 7110DC101PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Mrs. Stancil makes several assignments of error, among them being that the competent evidence does not support the findings of fact; that the trial judge failed to find the facts as shown by the evidence; that the conclusions of law are incorrect; that prejudicial error was committed in awarding custody of Brian to the paternal grandmother; that the trial judge committed prejudicial error in giving the grandmother the right to say when the mother could visit the child; and in entering and signing the judgment.

We do not deem it necessary for decision in this case to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Baillie Lumber Co. v. Kincaid Carolina Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. McCourtney v. McCourtneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Phelps v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. In re E.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Hamlin v. HamlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API