Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Hinkle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966No. 455PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, C.J.

The plaintiff in his appeal assigns as error that portion of the order entered below which requires him to pay the defendant for moving costs, attorneys’ fees, and rent, in the sum of $4,368.

It is provided in pertinent part in G.S. 6-21 as follows:

“Costs in the following matters shall be taxed against either party, or apportioned among the parties, in the discretion of the court: * * *
“(4) In actions for divorce or alimony; and the court may both before and after judgment make such order respecting the payment of such costs as may be incurred by the wife, either by the husband or by her from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. In Re LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Phelps v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API