Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Optometry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1952No. 38299PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

In January, 1951 the State Board of Optometry filed a bill of complaint against Sears Roebuck and Company, charging it with the unlawful practice of optometry in its Jackson, Mississippi, retail store, in violation of Code of 1942, 'Secs. 8832-8846. Subsequently in March, 1951, the Board filed an amended hill of complaint, adding as a defendant Craftsman Optical Company, a Louisiana corporation qualified to do business in Mississippi.

Sears Roebuck and Company operates a large retail store on North State Street in Jackson. From June 15, 1950 to January 1, 1951, Sears leased to Craftsman…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. LensCrafters, Inc. v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Kelley v. Duling Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Zale Jewelry Co. of Wichita, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API