Legal Opinion

Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Williamson

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 1, 1954No. Civ. 6002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs bring this action under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act1 and challenge the constitutionality of certain provisions found in the recent Oklahoma Enactment dealing with the regulation of “visual care”.2 The statute subject to attack is commonly referred to as Enrolled House Bill No. 953 and is entitled:

“An Act relating to visual care: defining terms; prohibiting dishonest and dangerous practices in the sale of optical goods and devices ; prohibiting discrimination; making the Act cumulative to other laws; making violation a misdemeanor authorizing…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. People ex rel. Dunbar v. Gym of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Ritholz v. City of Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Kirk v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, MUSKOGEE CTY.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API