Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Zale Jewelry Co. of Wichita, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1956No. 39,148PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, C. J.:

This is an original action in quo warranto brought by the state on the relation of the attorney general wherein the state asks that the defendant corporation be ousted from engaging in the practice of optometry. Plaintiff also asks that the charter of the corporation be forfeited and a receiver appointed. Our commissioner found in favor of the defendant. The state asks us to read the record and make findings of fact and conclusions of law in its favor. The cause has been submitted on the merits.

The petition alleged that Zale was a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  4. State v. Kindy Optical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. State ex rel. Beck v. Goldman Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Early Detection Center, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Kelley v. Duling Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. St. Francis Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API