Legal Opinion
Ritholz v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 5, 1945No. Record No. 2919PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.
The Commonwealth of Virginia, at the relation of B. R. Bell, Roger C. Wheeler, L. E. Rayhorn, H. E. Cross and E. E. Crawford, composing the Virginia State Board of Examiners in Optometry, instituted these proceedings under the provisions of the Virginia declaratory judgment statutes (Code 1942 (Micliie), secs. 6i4oa-6i4oh) against Benjamin D. Ritholz, Morris I. Ritholz, Samuel J. Ritholz, Sylvia Ritholz, Sophie Ritholz and Fannie Ritholz, partners trading and doing business under the firm name of National Optical Stores Company.
The bill charged that an actual controversy had arisen between…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- McDermott's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- National Organization for Women v. Operation RescueDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- McDonald v. HAMPTON TRAINING SCHOOLSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.