Legal Opinion

Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1938No. Appeal, 264PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiffs, individually, as licensed optometrists, and as trustees of The Philadelphia County Optometric Society, and Pennsylvania Optometric Association, brought this bill in equity against Gimbel Brothers, Inc., a New York corporation, which conducts a department store in the City of Philadelphia, to enjoin it from the practice of optometry, directly and indirectly. The chancellor entered a decree, “That the defendant be enjoined from holding itself out as an optometrist, by advertisement, sign or otherwise, and from practicing optometry.”

Plaintiffs, not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Dvorine v. Castelberg Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. Kindy Optical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Brown v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Everett v. HarronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Bravo Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API