McPherson v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This case was transferred to this court after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, reversing a judgment that a peremptory writ of mandate should issue to compel the appellants to pay interest on a decree in a condemnation action, tried in the Superior Court in Tuolumne County, fixing the compensation for the' condemned property. The District Court of Appeal was of the opinion that the ease came within the rule that the writ of mandate cannot be used to require the payment of interest upon a principal sum admittedly due. Reliance was placed upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Engebretson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Barber v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Howe v. SouthreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bates v. GerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Jorgensen v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Irvine v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wenzler v. Municipal Court for the Pasadena Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Andrews v. Police Court of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.