Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1997No. C021828PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, J.

This case involves a dispute over a policy of the Regents of the University of California (the University) which provides that, as a condition of employment by the University, an employee must assign to the University any of the employee’s inventions and patents conceived in the course of employment; as consideration for the assignment, the employee will get a percentage of those net royalties and fees received by the University for a patented invention.

When Associate Professor Douglas V. Shaw was hired by the University to teach and do research, the patent policy specified…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Beck v. American Health Group International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API