Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Stockton Metropolitan Transit District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1973No. Civ. 13611PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.

Two individuals sue on behalf of themselves and other users of bus service supplied by the Stockton Metropolitan Transit District. The trial court rejected their petition for a writ of mandate to compel the transit district to install 20 bus stop shelters as projected by a federally financed program.

In addition to the parties’ appeal briefs, the court has received an amicus curiae brief filed by counsel representing the United States Secretary of Transportation. The briefs debate a number of issues—petitioners’ standing to sue, availability of mandamus to control…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  5. Board of Social Welfare v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Waste Management of Alameda County, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Waste Management v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. McGee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API