Legal Opinion
Canova v. Trustees of Imperial Irrigation District Employee Pension Plan
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 2007No. D048156PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
Gary Canova, Virginia Canova, Ronald Shelton, Michael Hodges and Jimmie Sexton (collectively Plaintiffs), current or former employees of Imperial Irrigation District (the District), appeal a judgment entered in favor of the District, the Trustees of Imperial Irrigation District Employee Pension Plan and the Board of Directors of the Imperial Irrigation District Employee Pension Plan (collectively Defendants) after the trial court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the claim filing requirements of the Government Claims…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Robinson v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.