Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1976No. 67PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The complaint alleges that, after its incorporation, Clover-dale adopted the contract of 18 May 1971 concerning the plaintiff’s employment as its president and general manager. Although a corporation may not technically ratify a contract made on its behalf prior to its incorporation, since it could not at that time have authorized such action on its behalf, it may, after it comes into existence, adopt such contract by its corporate action, which adoption may be express or implied, and thereby become liable for its performance. McCrillis v. A & W Enterprises, Inc., 270 N.C. 637,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Still v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API