Legal Opinion

Still v. Lance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1971No. 105PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The contract between the plaintiff and the County Board of Education, dated 26 May 1967, was executed in accordance with and in the form required by G.S. 115-142. It expressly incorporates within itself the provisions of the school law, including this statute. Upon its face, it contains no provision concerning the duration of the employment or the means by which it may be terminated. Nothing else appearing, such a contract of employment, even though it expressly refers to the employment as “a regular, permanent job,” is terminable at the will of either party irrespective of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Jesse Freeman v. The Gould Special School District of Lincoln County, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. Tuttle v. Kernersville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API