Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
We note from the outset that the issues raised in this case would, if the action had been commenced after the effective date of recent amendments to the North Carolina Communicable Disease Act, N.C.G.S. § 130A-148(h)-(j) (1989), be decided under that act. These provisions, which establish protections for those persons who test positive for the HIV virus, became effective 1 October 1989, subsequent to the filing of plaintiffs complaint and to entry of the order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for dismissal. Thus, for purposes of this appeal, plaintiff’s rights…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by253 opinions
- Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Brown v. FloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.