Legal Opinion

United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1988No. 598A87PublishedCited by 317 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

This appeal involves issues concerning non-competition clauses, tortious interference with contract, and unfair trade practices. These issues are before us on the basis of a dissenting opinion filed in the Court of Appeals. N.C.R. App. P., Rule 16(b) (1988).

Plaintiff, United Laboratories, Inc. (United), is in the business of manufacturing and selling specialty chemical products through a nationwide system of sales representatives. Its home office is in Addison, Illinois. Sales representatives are assigned to a specific geographical territory either on an exclusive or open basis.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by317 opinions

  1. Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  4. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

312 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API