Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1986No. 8521SC292PublishedCited by 256 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs assert error with respect to the entry of summary judgment dismissing each of their multiple claims. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that April Cornatzer is entitled to a trial upon two of the three claims which she asserts. However, with respect to her claim for wrongful discharge from employment and to each of the claims of Marlene Hogan and Sonya Mitchell, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

It is well settled that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment, a court does not resolve questions of fact but determines whether there exists any genuine…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Katz v. DoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by256 opinions

  1. Elizabeth F. Smith v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. White v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Waddle v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

251 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API