Legal Opinion

Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. Reid

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1970No. 7026SC472PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure (G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56) is a procedure new to the courts of this State. (For an excellent discussion of the history and purpose of the summary judgment procedure, see opinion by Judge Morris in Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425.) The purpose of the rule is not to resolve a disputed material issue of fact, if one exists, but to provide an expeditious method for determining whether any such issue does actually exist. The rule provides that “ [t] he judgment sought shall be rendered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Peace River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ward Transformer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Alltop v. JC PENNEY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Haithcock v. Chimney Rock CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API