Legal Opinion

Redding v. FW Woolworth Company

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1970No. 7021SC398PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The sole question presented is whether plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to require submission of the case to the jury. Defendant appellee contends that plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case of actionable negligence in that she failed to show (1) any duty or standard of care or any specific acts upon which the jury could predicate a finding of negligence, or plaintiff’s status in relation to the store; (2) failed to show that any action of Mr. Arnold was the cause of her injury, and (3) assuming Mr. Arnold’s conduct to have caused her injury, failed to show that it was reasonably…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Williams v. BoulericeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Gaskill v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Ashe v. Acme Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alva v. CloningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Haithcock v. Chimney Rock CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Redding v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API