Legal Opinion

Cockerham v. Ward

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1980No. 7818SC1141PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56 requires that the party moving for summary judgment “clearly [establish] the lack of any triable issue of fact by the record properly before the court.” Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., 296 N.C. 467, 469-70, 251 S.E. 2d 419, 421 (1979); Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 186 S.E. 2d 400 (1972). See generally 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.15[8] (2d ed. 1979). In Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, 286 N.C. 24, 209 S.E. 2d 795 (1974), our Supreme Court stated the applicable rule as follows:

This burden may be carried by movant by proving that an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Bryant v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Seese v. Volkswagenwerk A. G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Morrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API