Legal Opinion

Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATED

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 594PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

The decisive question on this appeal is whether or not the court erred in granting the motion for nonsuit.

Store owners are not insurers of the safety of customers on their premises. Copeland v. Phthisic, 245 N.C. 580, 582, 96 S.E. 2d 697. And where a customer slips and falls in the aisle of a store .the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has no application. Pratt v. Tea Co., 218 N.C. 732, 733, 12 S.E. 2d 242. But “those entering a store during business hours to purchase or look at goods do so at the implied invitation of the proprietor, upon whom the law imposes the duty of exercising ordinary…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Blevins v. Erwin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Pratt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Faircloth v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API