Legal Opinion
Rice v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1941No. Civ. 2746PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, J., pro tem.
The plaintiffs below sued to quiet title to certain lands in Santa Barbara County. The defendants having answered, the cause was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment having been entered for plaintiffs and a motion for a new trial having been denied, the defendants prosecute this appeal.
On June 30, 1937, the plaintiffs below, as lessors, leased to the defendants certain lands in the lease described, to be explored and developed for the production of oil, gas and other hydrocarbons. The term of the lease was 20 years and so long thereafter as oil or gas could be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hall v. AugurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Caswell v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Carlisle v. LadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Moon v. MarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- True Oil Company v. GibsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Valer Oil Co. v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Rehart v. KlossnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Romero v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wallace v. ImbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.