Legal Opinion
Rehart v. Klossner
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1941No. Civ. No. 2791PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment quieting plaintiffs’ title to real property in Ventura County. It is a companion case to Rehart v. Klossner, post, p. 46, the opinion in which is this day filed.
C. V. Rehart and Flora E. Rehart are the common source of title of the parties. On January 15, 1934, they executed an oil lease with defendant under which he now claims.
At the commencement of the trial ownership was stipulated as follows: “Flora E. Rehart has an undivided one-fourth interest; Georgia Anna Scott, an undivided one-fourth interest; Stella M. Rehart, as Executrix under the last will of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Huggins v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
- Gadbury v. Ohio & Indiana Consolidated Natural & Illuminating Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Ohio Oil Co. v. DetamoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baldwin v. KubetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Banks v. Calstar Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Romero v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wallace v. ImbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Yeoman v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950