Legal Opinion
Moon v. Marker
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1938No. Civ. 5985PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
From a judgment which was rendered in a suit in ejectment, five defendants have appealed. They claim the right under a sublease to retain possession of section 31, township 25 north, .range 5 west, M. D. M., being a portion of a tract consisting of 45,12'6 acres of land in Tehama County, jointly leased for a specified term of ten years to M. Kinnebrew by numerous property owners for the purpose of prospecting for oil and gas. The lease was executed February 1, 1926. It contained the following provision:
“This lease shall continue for a period of ten years from and after the date of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Parks v. Sinai Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Roach v. Junction Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hall v. AugurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Hull v. LaugharnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Land Co. v. Westlake Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- MacCo Construction Co. v. FickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Renner v. Huntington Etc. Oil & Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Renner v. Huntington-Hawthorne Oil & Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Reserve Oil & Gas Co. v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.