Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Imbertson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1961No. Civ. 6603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for specific performance of a lease-option agreement.

Facts

There is no conflict in the facts shown by the record before us. The pertinent facts are substantially as follows: Defendants own a moiety in the 280 acres of land in dispute. On April 28, 1955, the parties hereto signed a lease-option agreement wherein defendants herein were lessors and plaintiff was lessee.

By said lease, lessors granted to lessee for a period of two years all hydrocarbon, oil and gas found on the property and lessee agreed to pay $10 per year plus…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. Groom Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Covina-Azusa Fire Fighters Union, Local 2415 v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Davis v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API