Wallace v. Imbertson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for specific performance of a lease-option agreement.
Facts
There is no conflict in the facts shown by the record before us. The pertinent facts are substantially as follows: Defendants own a moiety in the 280 acres of land in dispute. On April 28, 1955, the parties hereto signed a lease-option agreement wherein defendants herein were lessors and plaintiff was lessee.
By said lease, lessors granted to lessee for a period of two years all hydrocarbon, oil and gas found on the property and lessee agreed to pay $10 per year plus…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wright v. Groom Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Covina-Azusa Fire Fighters Union, Local 2415 v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Davis v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963