Legal Opinion
Carlisle v. Lady
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1930No. Docket No. 3808PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE FINCH Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
The plaintiffs filed their complaint herein, in the usual form, to quiet their title to a section of land. The answer alleges that on May 3, 1922, the plaintiffs executed and delivered to F. G-. Bogle “an oil and gas lease” of all but twenty acres of the land and that the defendants have acquired and are the owners of all the rights granted to Bogle by the terms of the lease in and to the south half of the section. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs quieting their title to all the lands in controversy and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Hall v. AugurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Taylor v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Baker v. Woman's Christian Temperance UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. BloomfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Montana-Fresno Oil Co. v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Alexander v. OatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Rice v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.