Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Speerstra

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1983No. A7809-15242; CA A23712PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

This is a legal malpractice case arising out of the defense of a medical malpractice case. In the latter case, defendant attorneys were retained by St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) in 1974 to represent its insured, Salem Hospital, in defense of consolidated medical malpractice actions brought by Ned and Opal Crippen against the hospital and five physicians. The Crippens settled with four of the doctors for $550,000, took a voluntary non-suit against the fifth doctor and proceeded to trial against the hospital as the sole defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Morgan v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API