Childers v. Spindor
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Defendant has filed a petition for review of our decision in this case. 84 Or App 407, 733 P2d 1388 (1987). We treat the petition as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. We are persuaded that we did not address the question actually presented and, had we done so, we would have reversed and remanded the judgment. We therefore allow reconsideration, withdraw our former opinion in toto, reverse the judgment and remand the case for trial.
This malpractice case arose out of defendant’s legal representation of plaintiff in the dissolution of her marriage to Janelli. After the dissolution…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Collins v. GreensteinHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Pavlik v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pereira v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Drake v. WickwireAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Faber v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Hadley v. Extreme Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Skaggs v. HendgenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.