Legal Opinion

Farhang v. Kariminaser

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 2009No. CV06120132, A138155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Plaintiff petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in Farhang v. Kariminaser, 230 Or App 554, 217 P3d 218 (2009). In that opinion, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court, which awarded plaintiff $120,000 in damages for defendant’s failure to make payments on loan obligations but denied plaintiff prejudgment interest on that award. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration relating to his sole assignment of error, that the trial court erred by denying plaintiff prejudgment interest. We allow the petition for reconsideration and adhere to the opinion.

The trial court denied plaintiffs request for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Langfus, Inc. v. QueiroloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Farhang v. KariminaserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frakes v. NayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Quick Collect, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Patton v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Spaid v. 4-R Equipment, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Element Materials Technology Food US LLC v. KahlDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API