Legal Opinion

Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1984No. 16-79-09299, CA A22583, SC 29362PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

Defendant has filed a petition for rehearing, to which plaintiff has, pursuant to our request, filed a response. The thrust of the petition for rehearing is that even if our decision that there was an indemnity agreement between the parties was correct, plaintiff was not entitled to a directed verdict, as we held in our former opinion. NW Pac. Indem. v. Junction City Water Dist., 295 Or 553, 558, 668 P2d 1206, 1209 (1983).

A short review of the progress of this case is appropriate. Plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals from a judgment for defendant on a jury verdict. Plaintiff stated five…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Biomass One, L.P. v. S-P ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Hagan v. Gemstate Manufacturing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API